On: Wired has removed "How Google alters search querie...

[signatoremo]

What you are saying is that you are biased against Google. I doubt that you demand proof every time you see retraction, and that you consider the publisher liars if they don’t show the proof. Right?

Also, Wired didn’t say the “proof” came from Google

[dev1ycan → signatoremo]

Yes if there is a retraction I want to see the source of it, else I will assume there was an ulterior motive for it.

[brookst → dev1ycan]

And yet you’ll happily accept the original article that did not have sourcing, because it aligns with your biases?