I think there's a lot to be said for just ignoring projects that you aren't interested in or think are taking the wrong approach. This post is a mostly fair critique of the project, but it's just going to create a lot of pointless drama. There's no 'NeoHaskell' that anyone can download at the moment, so it's not as if newbies are going to be misled into downloading an experimental implementation instead of GHC.
Author here. It is true that one of my goals in writing that post was to discourage people from jumping on the NeoHaskell train, but a larger goal was to educate people on what NeoHaskell actually was because there were a LOT of misconceptions floating around that led to confusion (and that confusion in turn amplified the drama because people were reading things into NeoHaskell that were not actually true).
