Meet the new moral panic, same as the old moral panic.
Funnily enough, all of that can be found into Google. Or who knows, maybe even in a library, that kids can access freely! (though it seems the article authors never heard of such a thing)
So do fiction writers. I hear there's even an entire genre of fiction that is expressly devoted to describing the commission of, and the solution to, violent crimes. And another genre that's all about war. And several genres about sex (with various focuses and levels of clinical detail). And books that discuss societal taboos ranging from incest to cannibalism. And...
> Nope, LLMs hallucinate, that’s what you don’t find online.
People spinning elaborate narratives out of their imagination that aren’t true is, in fact, a thing I find (including resulting in dangerously false information on topics likely to be important to people) online all the time.
Hallucination actually makes the problem pointed out "less worse" because maybe it will tell you how to make fire with orange juice.
Though again, people are attributing too much agency to a stochastic parrot. A parrot with a very large memory and sometimes off the rockers but still a parrot
You can sue anyone. You'll almost certainly not get anywhere for someone in the US, and any other country would tell you to pound sand. It's the same situation in practice.
Don't listen to random people for your personal medical decisions, robot or human, or you're going to have a bad time
Funnily enough, all of that can be found into Google. Or who knows, maybe even in a library, that kids can access freely! (though it seems the article authors never heard of such a thing)