I was firing that list off the top of my head and I think that one was a mistake. My bad.
But, I did recently have some weird typing issues around "satisfies" x vs "is" x and using new() constructors of the T in a generic functions (particularly de-alternative serialization of proto.Message types) and had quite a bit of frustration and confusion. That may have been on me, but I did open my statement with "[wish it had better docs]".
But, I did recently have some weird typing issues around "satisfies" x vs "is" x and using new() constructors of the T in a generic functions (particularly de-alternative serialization of proto.Message types) and had quite a bit of frustration and confusion. That may have been on me, but I did open my statement with "[wish it had better docs]".