Understand very little about the problem space and complain about the best-compromise solution that the people who do know what they're talking about came up with. It's a very comfortable position to be in, I recommend it to everyone.
I mean there's several existing solutions, NAT, ipv4 rationing, ip leasing, coexisting with ipv6.
Things look fine to me, the reality is dual stack, a full ipv6 transition is idyllic and pointless.
I'm certainly not the first ipv6 critic, and you may notice the nuance that I didn't advocate for not using it, I just don't advocate dropping ipv4. Furthermore it doesn't matter if I advocate it or not, like a train ipv4 keeps going, it's only ipv6 that is advocated.
Understand very little about the problem space and complain about the best-compromise solution that the people who do know what they're talking about came up with. It's a very comfortable position to be in, I recommend it to everyone.