This is one step closer to also normalizing genocide. Where do you draw the line of when it is ok to punish a group of people for something that someone who is vaguely* related to them did?
*The use of "family" is a red herring. The point is that a group of people is punished not because of attribution of some charges, but merely because the charged person/group cares enough for them. This can easily be extrapolated to "we will kill all X because we cannot capture the rebels among X".
*The use of "family" is a red herring. The point is that a group of people is punished not because of attribution of some charges, but merely because the charged person/group cares enough for them. This can easily be extrapolated to "we will kill all X because we cannot capture the rebels among X".