Sure, but I feel a comparison is more appropriate, like including "as with all other major LLM", rather than writing it in a way that suggests it's remotely unique. As written, I see it as an intentional omission that's misleading, and/or an indicator of bias against Ernie.
I agree, the article comes off as being particularly anti-CCP. We can discuss the merits of that position, but it's disingenuous to not point out that Western-centic models do the exact same thing.
Yeah. That’s not interesting at all. That’s the norm.