Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Disgusting.

  * The Economist (more often than not missing the point and failing on preditions.)
  * No link to original research.
  * Lack of signs of peer-reviewed research
  * Missing analysis of opposing view.
This isn't science or unbiased journalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing_Broken_Windows#Critics_o...




The article was about the research Dr Keizer has just published in Science. How is that research not original or peer reviewed ?


Somehow I missed that paragraph, sorry. My bad.

Still... The Economist.. Against graffiti... I don't know.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: