Both of these are meant for embedded development only.
You implied before that there are major JDK distributions which are not based on OpenJDK, but these two examples do not show that: these are niche JDKs.
Not only I am not here to save people's work, those were two examples when you asked for one, and now proven wrong, got to move goalposts with additional stuff, because "those don't count oh oh".
A JVM is a JVM, regardless of deployment scenarios and who gets to use them.
Of course there are some niche JDKs around that do not use OpenJDK... Hell, I've written a subset of the JDK from scratch just for fun.
I am not moving goal posts, I am just saying that a JVM specializing on embedded devices is not a JDK most people would use, only a small number of niche applications... so you haven't shown anything other than there are alternative JDKs available for niche applications, which I agree with! But I was saying that all JDKs people working on most applications rely on are based on OpenJDK. If you want to include a niche JDK for embedded devices, fine, but that's not what I or most people would care about, I would think.
It would be more pleasant to discuss with you if you expressed yourself a bit more like an adult (even if you're still a teenager which I am guessing is the case), by the way...
You implied before that there are major JDK distributions which are not based on OpenJDK, but these two examples do not show that: these are niche JDKs.