This comment (and the subsequent follow-up reply) violates the HN comment guidelines:
- Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
- When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
Lighten up. Someone answered a question in a concise manner with some pseudo code, probably in a language they haven’t context switched to in a couple weeks. The pedantry you’re displaying doesn’t help the conversation. Do you have substantive insight to provide about how the go GC works with Java’s different JVM improvements?
What of it, though? I noticed, but didn't think much of it because pseudocode doesn't need to be valid and usually isn't. What is the problem with these syntax errors that you are trying to address by calling attention to them?
