I went to the same meetup (ZuriHac), and arrived at the opposite conclusion.
I gave a lightning talk there on how the Haskell job market has been growing steadily since 2008 [1] [2].
The GHC bug tracker is full of new people filing bugs from production environments.
Consultancy blogs such as [3] regularly show industry-sponsored improvements to GHC, which was much more infrequent 10 years ago.
A this year's ZuriHac, around 50% of attendees were new to Haskell / had never visited ZuriHac before (this was an audience question).
In the past, there were a few well-known companies that used Haskell, in specific niches. Today, the big niches are diminished, and there are more companies that use it in more niches.
> the developer experience and ecosystem for Haskell is as bad as it was
The developer experience improved significantly over the last years.
Today, you can get a good quality IDE environment with VSCode and Haskell-Language-Server that works in both simple and complex environments, and includes all the features you'd expect (completions, immediate type error checking, scoped renames, go-to-definition, find-all-references, call hierarchy, docs-on-hover).
> The developer experience improved significantly over the last years.
> Today, you can get a good quality IDE environment with VSCode and Haskell-Language-Server that works in both simple and complex environments, and includes all the features you'd expect (completions, immediate type error checking, scoped renames, go-to-definition, find-all-references, call hierarchy, docs-on-hover).
In 2023 Haskell has indeed kind of reached 2003 levels of IDE support but you can forget about a working debugger, practical compile times or you know, stack traces.
Simon Peyton-Jones, the very inventor of the language is now working on Tim Sweeney's Metaverse-themed prolog bullshit. There's no energy left in Haskell.
Haskell has fallen between the cracks as neither a super efficient compiled language or a practical interpreted one. It's just a pain in the ass.
I gave a lightning talk there on how the Haskell job market has been growing steadily since 2008 [1] [2].
The GHC bug tracker is full of new people filing bugs from production environments.
Consultancy blogs such as [3] regularly show industry-sponsored improvements to GHC, which was much more infrequent 10 years ago.
A this year's ZuriHac, around 50% of attendees were new to Haskell / had never visited ZuriHac before (this was an audience question).
In the past, there were a few well-known companies that used Haskell, in specific niches. Today, the big niches are diminished, and there are more companies that use it in more niches.
> the developer experience and ecosystem for Haskell is as bad as it was
The developer experience improved significantly over the last years.
Today, you can get a good quality IDE environment with VSCode and Haskell-Language-Server that works in both simple and complex environments, and includes all the features you'd expect (completions, immediate type error checking, scoped renames, go-to-definition, find-all-references, call hierarchy, docs-on-hover).
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36742311
[2] https://github.com/nh2/haskell-jobs-statistics
[3] https://well-typed.com/blog/