No real disagreement there. Ultimately my biggest concern is that real children are not exploited and damaged by experiences they're clearly not ready for - if using AI-generated pornography turned out to be a particularly effective way to achieve that (with no obvious negative side-effects, and to be clear I doubt that's particularly likely to be the case), then I would think we shouldn't dismiss it out of hand as something that must be banned just because it intuitively seems so awful.
