Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

`:not(:first-child)` has specificity 0.1.0 that is some orders higher than 0.0.0 of `* + *` (since `:first-child` is a pseudoclass), so you'd have to adjust anything that you'd need to override it with.

Strict equivalent of

    * + *
would be

   :where(:not(:first-child))



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: