Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> This is a weird assumption. What's preventing a backend system from saying "Hey, we think you're a bot. Here's an alternative way to contact us."

Not a weird assumption, but a necessary assumption based on considerations of scale.

A small-scale website that doesn't receive too much spam attempt can manually classify spam by human agents. A medium-scale website can have CAPTCHA to let through some visitors and the rest goes to human verification. You appear to be in this bucket. When the scale is huge, no other alternative way to contact exists. CAPTCHA becomes your only tool.

In other words, CAPTCHA is only necessary because of scale; what do you think the first A stands for? But because of scale, alternate ways stop working.




>When the scale is huge, no other alternative way to contact exists

1. This still doesn't preclude giving a blocked user recourse or information. Like how a streaming website will say "Hey, you're using a VPN. We don't allow that" - the user's recourse is to turn off the VPN, or find a new VPN that their service won't detect.

2. The case you're outlining is different from the scenario that most users are presented with a CAPTCHA. I encounter it when I am using a VPN and Googling something with Incognito mode. That means Google has already applied some heuristics and thinks that chances are higher than normal that I'm a bot (not logged in, no cookies allowed, masking IP address) before presenting the challenge. In those cases, you're probably correct that presenting a CAPTCHA is a reasonable option. I just think it's weird to have CAPTCHA be the default/first line in many cases. Especially with the focus on things like converting users.


> Like how a streaming website will say "Hey, you're using a VPN. We don't allow that" - the user's recourse is to turn off the VPN, or find a new VPN that their service won't detect.

No, the user's recourse is to stop using the streaming website and go back to piracy instead.

Any speedbump to UX is a lost customer. You can not and should not assume that users are going to jump through hoops, because the overwhelming majority will not.


I mean, the vast majority of people will not "go back" to piracy. Piracy isn't an option that's on the table for them. But you're missing the point.

>Any speedbump to UX is a lost customer. You can not and should not assume that users are going to jump through hoops

So... CAPTCHA isn't a hoop? Both scenarios are hoops.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: