> As for cases, DnD changed thier "races" in response to violations raised in court iirc. They pushed right to the line as close as possible and that was long before we reached modern IP law which is exceedingly more stringent than back in the 80s, right?
Yes. They also go after orgs that were printing commemorative coins and succeeded. In this instance, they went after TSR for straight ripping things for their game.
That still doesn't address what I was referring to, however. I haven't seen any push by the Tolkien Society to go after this alleged "stealing" of Tolkien's ideas through the inclusion of Tolkien-distinct elves (and they are very distinct from their source, as you pointed out) or other species.
Which is interesting, because they Tolkien Society actually has the audacity to claim you're not allowed to write fanfiction:
"[...]This means that you cannot copy any part of Tolkien’s writings or images, nor can you create materials which refer to the characters, stories, places, events or other elements contained in any of Tolkien’s works."
Aside from being so absolutely full of themselves, they still aren't engaging in attempting to stop authors from "stealing".
Because they have no legal basis for it and know it.
Because it's not actually "stealing" when authors adopt them into their worlds if they're not, as you said, taking names, culture, [and] historical features. There's no legal grounds and they know it.
The Tolkien Estate recently rewrote their "rules" in the last couple years, reflecting a much-stronger stance on derivative works. And yet, I don't think you'll be able to show me many instances of them "protecting their IP" against authors.
Those operating the estate have a fiduciary duty to the stakeholders, meaning they can't pursue litigation where costs would exceed potential value nor when it would have a more significant negative impact on value than protections.
From this most instances of infringement do not justify legal action as the parties in violation have little to no money (fan fictions etc. Can't get blood from a stone) and in many cases the pursuit of legal action would "harm the brand" in a fashion that would far exceed the value (a 1% reduction in consumer engagement is hundreds of thousands if not millions in value).
Copyright is not the same as trademarks, you don't have to pursue every single violation in order to maintain protections.
So what you're saying is you have no objective measure of theft occurring.
You're basing your entire position on an opinion that is very, very clearly not shared by most of reality.
As I said, there are very clear instances of "appropriation", but most occurrences I've seen aren't, in my opinion.
Example: Paolini's elves are clearly appropriation. I also hated the elves in Inheritance because of that, for what it's worth. The elves in The Elvenborn, as another example, aren't. Both instances resemble Tolkien elves visually, but one copies a large amount of cultural overtones and racial "personality", and the other's written by Andre Norton and Mercedes Lackey.
If I write a book with a creature I call trolls and they are giant blue hairy with small shark like teeth, a "design" with nearly no association to extant trolls, and that is then appropriated by damn near everyone your position is that they didn't engage in theft, right?
You could see how any author would find such an assertion absurd, right?
Just because it's legal doesn't change what it is. We have plenty of types of "theft" in the _colloquial_ sense that are not theft under law.
> Just because it's legal doesn't change what it is.
Purely opinion. It is well-acknowledged that authors build off ideas they have experienced. Tolkien was a brilliant and inspiring writer who inspired many other writers.
That's how it works. Humans take in ideas, add some twists, and share them.
Yes. They also go after orgs that were printing commemorative coins and succeeded. In this instance, they went after TSR for straight ripping things for their game.
That still doesn't address what I was referring to, however. I haven't seen any push by the Tolkien Society to go after this alleged "stealing" of Tolkien's ideas through the inclusion of Tolkien-distinct elves (and they are very distinct from their source, as you pointed out) or other species.
Which is interesting, because they Tolkien Society actually has the audacity to claim you're not allowed to write fanfiction:
"[...]This means that you cannot copy any part of Tolkien’s writings or images, nor can you create materials which refer to the characters, stories, places, events or other elements contained in any of Tolkien’s works."
Aside from being so absolutely full of themselves, they still aren't engaging in attempting to stop authors from "stealing".
Because they have no legal basis for it and know it.
Because it's not actually "stealing" when authors adopt them into their worlds if they're not, as you said, taking names, culture, [and] historical features. There's no legal grounds and they know it.
The Tolkien Estate recently rewrote their "rules" in the last couple years, reflecting a much-stronger stance on derivative works. And yet, I don't think you'll be able to show me many instances of them "protecting their IP" against authors.
I've looked.
[1] https://www.tolkienestate.com/frequently-asked-questions-and...