On: Checking in on troubles with dark matter

[sebzim4500]

It's a bit of a false dichotomy. Even the MOND people recognize that you need dark matter (even if they don't use the term) to explain the bullet cluster, so it isn't really dark matter vs MOND.

It's "dark matter" vs "MOND + dark matter"

[magicalhippo → sebzim4500]

I admit I haven't followed the field closely, but when reading papers about MOND I've never gotten that impression.

Do you have some examples?

edit: I hadn't read (or forgotten) the notes by Milgrom as shared in the other reply.