Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Most humans can do neither, so it's setting the bar far too high.



I think we should compare what best of LLMs can do with what the best of humans can do for a fair comparison.

Else, we will be comparing what the best LLM can do with what the media/mean human can do.

I can also point to tons of language models (both large and small) which don't do anything remotely useful.


What is fair about that when judging whether or not they can be creative? Most people whom other people would judge to be creative are nowhere near the best of us.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: