Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

These dollars are apparently well spent: You are aware these drinks exist and you consider them to be the market leader in these types of drinks.

> Aligned with what is actually best for the consumer

This is a classic straw man.

Who said it needs to be? They are simply educating you on the existence of their product. But marketing doesn't remove your agency to decide if you want to drink them or not, or whether that product is good for you. There are products that I am aware of due to marketing that serve no purpose to me, but I am not helplessly buying them anyways. I agree that in some scenarios (like we saw with cigarettes) this can go awry, and maybe advertising should be restricted for certain types of food. But in general, most products are not like this.

> You paid them with your attention and they helped you find solutions to your problems.

If Google didn't solve a problem for you, you would likely stop using it. You wouldn't continue to use Google simply to see their ads. Their advertisers would disappear if you weren't there, so first and foremost they must deliver a good product to you.




> marketing doesn't remove your agency

If it didn't to some extent do that there would be little point in spending all that money on it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: