On: US Supreme Court rules website designer can refuse...

[49531]

Building a wedding website for same-sex couples is not a prohibition in Christianity. In fact, it's closer to a tenet of the faith than a prohibition.

Perhaps if she was asked to make a website called www.thebibleisfake.com you might have a case for infringement of speech.

[paulddraper → 49531]

Theological squabbling over doctrine isn't really the point here.

[KMag → 49531]

But, the justification is a non-sequitur. The ruling is that the content, not the customer, was the determining factor in refusing the business, and therefore legal.