On: Microsoft, OpenAI sued for ChatGPT 'privacy violat...

[chasing]

So you’re saying I’m right except in some narrowly carved-out situations. And I agree with you.

[crazygringo → chasing]

Nope. You said:

> I wasn't asked and I don't really care to donate work to large corporations like that... I do get to decide what happens with it.

And I said:

> No. Both legally and practically, you absolutely do not.

You think you get to decide whether large corporations can train on your work. I'm saying the the law suggests you very much don't get to decide that.

[chasing → crazygringo]

Read the comments you're replying to. I didn't comment on the legality of ChatGPT training on my content, I said I didn't like it. Regardless, the act of posting content publicly does not mean I give up my copyright claim. Yes, there are fair use situations. Training ChatGPT might be one of them, but I'm not seeing lot of concrete information one way or the other and I am seeing arguments that ChatGPT could be considered a derivative work, which would place OpenAI in violation of my copyright.

Send some links if you see some definitive case law sorting this stuff out.