Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't think he's "suggesting" anything. He's noting that two phenomena are resistant to story-telling.



This idea that there's an agenda for every observation seems to have started in the past 10 years. I find it very strange. It really shackles the mind, and conversation.


I notice my mind tends to think this way as well. Thinking about why I will think that usually yields recollections of people making "innocent" observations while they clearly had ulterior motives; such memories are in-person events, not this sort of interaction online. That said, it's easy to (read: difficult not to) apply similar heuristics to online interactions.

Not to excuse it; I agree with your conclusion. Hopefully such an understanding can help people to be patient with the behavior despite the annoyance.


Which would seem to argue in favor of what I understood to be the article's point, which is why I'm curious to know what he's pointing at.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: