Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't really get the hostility in your response. Yes, one-time pads are not a practical solution for most use cases, but I never claimed they would be. I was just making a point about their "theoretically unbreakable" property, which I thought is interesting in this context.



There's no hostility here, just realism about what one-time pads represent in cryptography.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: