> I believe the reasoning here is that it's often easier to teach by analogy.
The problem is less the analogy and more the analogy to C++. Which is fine if you’re targeting C++ devs, and C++ oriented rust guides are certainly researched (I saw queries several times on /r/rust). It’s more problematic if you’re billing the guide as more general.
The problem is less the analogy and more the analogy to C++. Which is fine if you’re targeting C++ devs, and C++ oriented rust guides are certainly researched (I saw queries several times on /r/rust). It’s more problematic if you’re billing the guide as more general.