I would assume not. I don't think he thinks of it as a charity, but the tension between continued profit and doing amazing things in this case doesn't bother me. I think it's positive in that the better he does the more people he can impact. Transactions can be incredibly positive even if they are dispassionate.
I understand your point. It's a good one and well taken. Very eloquently put.
Those two things are definitely not always aligned and probably arent always in this case either.
I understand your point. It's a good one and well taken. Very eloquently put.
Those two things are definitely not always aligned and probably arent always in this case either.