Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is a problem of bad engineering: not using an immutable OS firmware model with a spare.

There ought to be 3 physically-separate flash devices: bootloader (never changed), OS (managed by bootloader - updates deleted unless signed correctly), and data (wipeable by a physical reset button).

If you don't do this, then you're inviting implants a priori.




And what do you do when a bootloader vulnerability is discovered then?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: