Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

A thing is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. Valuation by formula is a pseudo science because every thing you do is ultimately subjective.



What someone is willing to pay for something is very arbitrary and will be influenced by such pseudo science valuation formulas if they set the price first. Price anchoring as a form of a self fulfilling prophecy.

Diamonds are worth a fraction of what Debeers wants for them, but people still pay it because those are the only prices they've ever seen. On the other hand, printers are worth far more than they sell for, yet nobody would consider paying the actual price for them.


The formula allows you to compare. It is the same psuedo science as comparing SSD drive prices using storage capacity as a factor.


Subjective things can’t be described by a formula?


Who knows what takes place in a person's mind? They may not be clear themselves. So, no, unlikely, unless or until the 'it' is objectified.


It’s an educated guess, not the word of God. You don’t have to know it precisely to produce useful results. The entirety of physics is wrong, so what, it still allows us to build rockets, skyscrapers and computers.


And there's a wide variation between even two people on what that guess should be.


Fortunately, we have things called markets to allow the people that think something is overvalued to sell it to people who think it's undervalued...


Markets ? Rituals ! Religion !


The unit of analysis is firms, not individuals.

My interest, at the halfway point through The Famous Article, is whether the relative sizes of the firms (in employees) fit in there somewhere.

Money is used as a sort of analytic "low common denominator" in all of this work, but that seems a narrow window for viewing life in general.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: