Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No no no. You're confused.

There is no algorithm acting independently. The responsibile agent(s) is(are) a person(people).




No no no. You're confused.

I didn't absolve the creator of guilt, I just said that it's unlikely they're intentionally trying to make her sad. They're just trying to increase engagement - at any cost.


Why? What motivates ByteDance?


Profit, presumably? Same as any other company. Engagement = profit has been the formula for some time now.


There's some speculation that ByteDance is motivated by political goals as well as, or more than, profit.


Exactly. These outcomes are the results of the algorithms and their tuning, whether intentional or not. Humans are responsible for it and can tune it differently, to a different result. However, these new tunings may reduce engagement or other profit drivers, which a for-profit company will obviously not want to do.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: