Exactly. For every "it's not human but does something similar to what humans do" there's some "oh but it's not human so what it does is not what humans do". The first one is interesting, the second one is self gratifying. Duhh if it was doing exactly what humans do it would be human which it logically can't be, tell me something I don't know:)
> not in the sense we do.
Isn't that the point? That in some ways it seems familiar, yet gets there in ways utterly foreign?