Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

tasty, while I agree with your sentiment, I disagree with your characterization because it falls into a trap of giving legitimacy to groups that have no legitimacy or credibility.

Whenever you start talking about banning a specific group, your efforts are wasted because who decides the group. Someone at the top, and can they always be trusted to decide that? No.

If you need to talk about banning something outright, that's a far more approachable argument that doesn't add to the noise.

Also, it is known that the brain continues to develop after 18, there isn't some magic switch at 18 that says these people aren't still vulnerable.

Addiction and exploitation continue to happen regularly after that age, just look at gaming in general how many people are now in their 40s and spend more than 10 hours a week on gaming?

Some people are more equipped than others to deal with addiction than others, what that difference is between success outcomes and others should be promoted and studied.

Any system that can amplify or de-amplify a message runs into these problems. Its not just social media. Its algorithms too, and they are designed to exploit you and your psychology to get what they want which is profit or control in one way or another. That's what the humans who built these algorithms optimized for.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: