It's a good (long) read, and has some valuable insights.
That said, I've been living these principles since I was 18 (long story, lots of tears, bring a hanky).
I can tell you that anyone can benefit from this.
But most simply, if there were one single trait that I think has been key for me; it's been self-discipline. It has paid off all over the place.
Finishing stuff takes a great deal of what people like to call "grit." There's a ton of unpleasant, boring, hard-to-digest stuff, in delivering a finished product. In many cases, it can be more than half the project.
In my experience, not giving up, and powering through the "boring bits,", when, what I wanted to do, was go into a fetal position under my desk, and sob into Mr. Floppy Ear Bunny, has done the trick.
It also does wonders for self-image, and self-confidence (which, unfortunately, is often interpreted as "arrogance" -nothing is perfect).
I've found that starting the day at 5AM, and with a 5Km walk (which I hate), is useful. Everything after that, is gravy. Real gym rats beat that handily. Many of my friends work out for a couple of hours before getting into work.
I commend you for your success and self-discipline. But as advice it seems almost circular. How do you actually not give up and power through? I have often pushed myself with big projects and challenging work. More often than not it results in me literally sobbing under my desk.
it's actually counter intuitive, but being "disciplined" is actually not great for finishing projects. Rather, it's better to setup a habit and routine, and stick to it for a long time, whether you accomplish anything during that time or not. E.g., work on blah for 30mins, at 9:30pm before sleeping, or at 6am when awake. Don't change this time, and don't do more time than originally planned (regardless of progress or lack thereof).
Habits are more powerful than self-control and discipline.
I think it's more nuanced than that. I like to simplify these complex topics to myself by gamifying them a little.
Imagine every time you make a conscious decision to do something you expend willpower points. You have a only a set number of willpower points a day.
Some things you like, some things you don't, and that depends how much they will cost. Choosing not to do something can also costs points, because it's a habit.
Habits are a way to reduce or discount this choice associated cost.
Now, I recently thought a lot about discipline, motivation, dreaming (for the future) and hope. And I think the problem with discipline is that, everyone has a different definition on it, and it also changes between context. Military discipline is not the same as daily discipline. Soldiers are plenty undisciplined in their daily lives.
When people talk about discipline they think "doing things that one doesn't want doing" but it's really not that simple. It all ties to hopefulness and dreaming for the future.
And s someone who's experienced this first hand due to a traumatic childhood: People who don't value themselves won't be disciplined for their own sakes, but they can be incredibly disciplined for the sake of others. So, there's a component of seeing value in what you do, or believe that there is value even if you don't see it.
So, like everything in life, discipline is multi faceted.
As an example, people talk about dopamine and motivation, but I've realised that it's probably closely tied to discipline too. You need to be motivated to be disciplined.
I've recently started becoming more "disciplined" by being incredibly intentional about trying to regulate my dopamine baseline throughout the day. I started doing it to feel less miserable throughout the day, but ended up being more disciplined as a side effect. And I've also realised that this has increased my daily "willpower" budget from earlier.
Let me preface this with: there's a bit of bro-science in this, but it seems to work for me.
I think the main component is that after I wake up, I have a normal warm shower, and after I rinse myself. However, then I turn to cold water. There's some research[^1] that shows that this creates an effect of slow dopamine release.
Next thing to do is be mindful about what gives you dopamine spikes, and how to not have them too often, since if you do it too much your body becomes "used" too too much dopamine. Basically, biology likes homeostasis, so it will find a way to achieve it.
This includes not drinking coffee too early too, but around midday/noon, and trying to couple coffee with activities you _want_ to enjoy, but not necessarily do, because coffee increases dopamine levels[^2], so it's "hacking" your brain to consider this reward-seeking behaviour by pairing the artificical dopamine increase with something you would like to enjoy (like say exercise, or learning a new skill, or work). There's other obvious benefits of caffeine like improved focus and concentration.
Now, all this might sound like "too much dopamine," since it's very "do this that gives you dopamine, do that that give you dopamine", but it's not that you're getting spikes in dopamine like you get from sex (or masturbation, or cocaine, etc), it's small releases that you strategically pair with activities that are good for you. Over time as they become habits you won't have to consume willpower for them, and you won't have to constantly be so intentional about what you do.
There's also the other side of the coin, like "reducing" dopamine. Doing stuff that you don't enjoy can suck, but sometimes that stuff is good for you. This is where the psychological component comes in. Thank yourself (think of yourself as your future self thanking your past/current self) for engaging in these activities after you do them. Gratitude releases dopamine, too[^3]. So the brain then associates this as reward seeking behaviour, and it becomes less hard in the future. It's not surprise that drug addicts will go to incredible lengths (I was a drug addict myself, so talking first-hand here) to get their substance of choice even if it's a giant chore and not enjoyable. Why? Reward-seeking behaviour; the reward is the dopamine, the behaviour is getting and consuming the drug. One could say they're incredibly disciplined to get that high (it's a weird way of putting it, but alas).
I've also—somewhat unsuccessfully due to the childhood trauma mentioned earlier—tried to pick up mediation. It's helped me initially with focus and mindfulness, but caused some emotional problems. They are always there, but for a lack of better word, my chaotic mind was probably somewhat of a "defence" mechanism to mitigate CPTSD[^4]. This is a home-brewed theory me and my therapist came to. Going through the stages of grief for my "lost childhood" and my therapist's open-mindedness to psilocybin-aided therapy helped resolve this. I've done Psilocybin later on my own as well, and I've managed to make a lot of progress even on my own (but I have to thank my therapist and myself for developing the mental tools to explore those in a productive way). I wouldn't blanket recommend psychedelics since I've had bad trips too, but they've helped me immensely.
Anyway, I've went a bit on a tangent here. Back to dopamine control. I can luckily now safely meditate without "relapsing", and that's helped a lot with focus, energy and overall willpower. It helps because I can choose what to focus on, and my mind is less ADHD-y. So this means you have to spend less "willpower points" on returning your mind to what matters to your "conscious self" (or ego). I don't know if I have ADHD or not, maybe; but it's likely related to the stuff I talked about earlier.
Meditation isn't very enjoyable for me, but as I started pairing it with gratitude and started seeing incredible benefits in my daily focus after only just about a week or so of daily 10-minute meditations, it's started to become enjoyable... Interesting even.[^5]
Listening to music releases dopamine too, but be careful you don't do too much of "dopamine layering" since the activity might be less enjoyable in the future without all these "helpers", or it can offset your baseline too much. So, if you're at the gym for example, listen to music some days, but do a few days where you are doing it without the music. Try (it isn't always easy) to enjoy the atmosphere of the environment too.
Always remember to be grateful to yourself after these activities, too. Progress is sometimes too slow to see, and for progress-minded people, it can be a bit discouraging. But the progress is there, even though you might not realise it immediately. Trust yourself you're doing the right thing if you know it to be right.
Also, another big component in this whole thing is energy. So make sure your body is treated well in a holistic matter, not just your brain. The body and the brain are a unit, and we often forget that in our day-to-day-lives, I think. So, make sure you get enough sleep, eat healthy. It helps to take probiotics, especially with modern diets; I take mine daily, but you don't have to be as rigid with it as I am (but I also have digestive issues and my GP suggested probiotics and multivitamins; it helps a lot for me). Drink water, but depending on where you live don't drink tap water; buy a Brita water jug (or whatever the equivalent is in your region). It's easier to make tough decisions when you're not exhausted, and that means you expend much less willpower points when you do make them.
It's late and I might've forgotten some stuff. I won't write much more so I don't risk you or someone else tl-dr-ing this (as I genuinely believe it's all good advice) but feel free to ask any follow-up questions if you're interested.
[^2]: This is well researched I think; just google "coffee dopamine" and take your pick
[^3]: This is more nuanced. You really need to do this with your full intent behind it. Murmuring a throwaway "thanks buddy" won't have the same effect. I combined this with journaling. I like to think __why_ was this good for me. Why do I think it helped me, how could it improve my life. Another big component with me is how I can improve the lives of people around me, since I'm a bit of a people pleaser. So, I like to muse on that too. If my life is good, I'm in a position to help others improve their lives, etc.
(Not the parent but I can relate) I'm not much accomplished yet but I have been maintaining a 60h+ work week for the past 3 years (ok, not every single week is a 60h one but most are). I never look at my feelings, I sit down and do the work no matter what. The concept of having to motivate myself to do something sounds extremely foreign. It's not just that I'm a workalcoholic, I always end work on time and I always wish I had more time for other things.
I have the discipline but I think the key is discipline + actually loving it, loving the thing that you are doing on average. Loving the process of discipline + loving the vision that you are working towards. I think that the passion and inspiration alone are not sufficient because there are always things you don't want to work on and you may really not feel like it sometimes, on the other hand, discipline for the sake of discipline without appreciation - having to push yourself... no. There must be both push and pull. If you don't feel any pull or if it's much weaker than the push then it most likely means that the sacrifice is not worth it or maybe you are doing way too much and not scheduling any time to appreciate the present moment.
I imagine so, not there yet. To me, it's certainly not just about programming but the project / product in particular as well as how much ownership / leadership over the thing I would have. If it feels like it's a part of the bigger picture and I get to develop skills I want to develop, that could be quite fun, even if I was doing it for someone else. My experience to date with other people's projects was not that exciting though but I liked it because I had the time to work on my own thing alongside. I remember working 2 months on a client's project exclusively while not having any time for mine, I was approaching 50h/week just for that project. I liked it on average but I remember the last week was tough, I really felt like I had enough and just thinking through some ideas about a potential future product / project felt like gasping for air while being underwater for too long.
I think that's the general theme of this. So long as a significant chunk of the work (i.e. 1/3) is genuinely enjoyable just for what it is, the other, more boring work is also more pleasant because: 1) - it feels like a part of the bigger picture that you like (i.e. whether you are doing something really boring or maybe earning money to buy yourself more time) and 2 - just conditioning, getting good emotions from one part of the work is partially transferred to the boring stuff and it needs to happen on an ongoing basis.
The fact that there are boring parts to it (which one can still learn to appreciate) provides the contrast and makes the highs much higher. However, there's also something I did not mention initially. I'm spending considerable time on appreciating the now, I would set aside 40 min every day to do Zen meditation and it really does help with the discipline / will power but perhaps most importantly - appreciating work that's boring - if I can get myself to enjoy sitting still or walking circles around the room, I can treat boring work not unlike extra Zen practice that sharpens me further. It does not have to be Zen practice but just ensuring that you are spending some time enjoying the now basically every day is critical when you you are often trying to make predictions about the future which is stress and anxiety inducing.
It's great to hear your success story. I love tech and I love programming, but 60h a week of a it sounds completely superhuman to me. It's like someone telling me they just ran a marathon in 2.5 hours. Sure, I know it's theoretically possible but I can't image what it takes to get here.
This thread has really made me realize what a disability ADHD is. I struggle to watch a movie from start to finish, even one I have been really looking forward to. I dream of being able to concentrate and work on what I want to do for an entire day. My ratio at the moment is about 1-2 hours of work in every 8 hour day.
It comes at some personal life sacrifice though and I will be looking to reduce it slightly in the coming years. It's basically a lifestyle of work and not much else, I set aside some time for a hobby which also involves socializing and that's why it's 60h/week (63h/week being theoretical max if nothing comes up) and not 70h/week.
Hitting the time on a regular day (not every day is like that) requires ongoing effort to sustain it. I spend 20 min / day doing time tracking and performance analysis (I think it makes more time than it costs). So for example if I want to hit 10h on a day which is purely dedicated to work, I wake up at 6, I end work at 8 and go to sleep at 9:30. That gives me 14h between 6 and 8, so it means that the combined time for the morning and midday routines must be under 4h. I don't stress about doing too little work on any given day, but I will always look at it the next day and consider what I could do better with the execution of the previous day . Then it mostly becomes a habit, I would just do it like a robot. Not every day is like that, but most are.
I'm sorry to hear about your disability. I don't know much about ADHD but perhaps you would find the following tips useful. You could look into Zen meditation - a good book with the how is 3 Pillars of Zen, feel free to discard the supernatural stuff and just focus on regular practice. One of the main benefits of Zen practice is increasing your attention span. It's extremely challenging to sustain focus on nothing and I still struggle with this despite doing it regularly for 5 years. It could be as simple as counting exhales and resetting the count every 10 breaths, expect to lose track fast but you get better at it with regular practice and this directly translates to your attention span when doing other things. Maybe you could also benefit from journaling - try to successively increase work blocks by a small amount every week or so and keep track of it. Other tips: avoid scrolling social media, get good sleep - you may need up to 8.5h of bed time / 8h of sleep, it's easy to be chronically sleep depleted without being aware about it and everything is much harder without good sleep, do quick breaks while working, i.e. 1 minute pause every 15 min just looking at the timer (not email!).
Why on earth do you want to work 60+ hours a week? It absolutely boggles my brain that anybody would be proud to work that many hours. Unless you are an entrepreneur working for yourself and love doing it.
I don't want it, it's been a necessity. Now I'm cutting it down a bit actually and putting my entrepreneurial pursuits on hold for some 4 - 5 years because there was just too much conflict with missing out on some other things in life that I find valuable.
best info i got on this topic is from weight training videos. applies to everything though, give it a shot. it's long but you can easily see from the slides what he's saying https://youtu.be/zNePCoXjC4s
quick gist is when people say motivation to train or do anything there's really a specific process we go through that determines to what extent we stick with anything
discipline is great but it's the part that takes willpower and it's not sustainable so if you don't like to do something you need the willpower to do it. it's not gonna last ever day for years. that people have to suffer to sustain things is misguided advice. the math doesn't check out.
sibling comment is correct here, discipline is necessary but only 1/6 of the framework. for long term sustainability we need habits plus higher order reasons to want to do it. passion ideally, or boosts of positive energy from inspiration and motivation.
What helps me doing something I don’t like on a daily basis (pull up for example) is thinking : I don’t have the choice. That way I consume much less willpower
> More often than not it results in me literally sobbing under my desk.
Sometimes you just need to get things out of your system. I feel much better after a good sob. The brain is not a perfectly designed machine, but a bug-ridden contraption that can do some amazing things. Of course, it would be much better to not feel the need to sob. But sobbing can be used to regain focus if you give yourself the freedom to let loose.
> How do you actually not give up and power through?
Break big problem into sequence of small and achievable goals. Getting small gratifications by completing small steps helps to maintain mental balance and avoid burn-out and dead-lock.
> How do you actually not give up and power through?
Sorry it took so long to respond. I browse HN on my breaks, and it's catch-as-catch-can.
I keep my eyes on the prize at the end. For me, it's all about having a finished product after all the agita.
There's also a lot of (in my case) interest in the Mission of the project. One project that I did, took ten years to really start coming into its own. During that time, I was pretty much left on my own, and even outright abused (by the end users, and also "gatekeepers," who wanted to control the project).
It all came out great, in the end. The project was taken over by a new team, and very little of my original code remains in the current version.
I'm happy about that. Most of what I wanted to do, was push the idea of the project (an infrastructure-level resource locator).
The most powerful thing for me has been realizing how quickly habits develop, good and bad. It can be so easy to say "oh, I'll start running TOMORROW", or "why bother going for a run today, when I'm never going to be able to keep it up?"
But actually, surprisingly, things you don't initially want to do can become positive habits in a very short time period. Like, 3-5 times. Of course, the flip side is also true; I've often fallen OUT of workout habits just as easily. But at the end of the day, perfection is not the goal. You shouldn't avoid starting a new positive habit just because you know you'll probably lose the habit again. You can always pick it up once more!
Someone who is a regular gym-goer for a few years, then becomes sedentary, then picks up running for a half decade, then moves on to cycling, then falls out of the habit, is probably better off than someone who never bothers to try.
I agree completely. Taking a shower, brushing my teeth and other routine things have never become a habit for me either. I have to put in the same effort every time.
Of course there are habitual things in my life, but I can see no common characteristics. Total time spend certainly isn't it.
Amusingly, this has made it almost trivial for me to quit smoking despite being a smoker for many years. I just never developed a habit for it, so dropping it was as simple as just not smoking.
I don’t run, but I lift. One important thing to realize by myself was that I must not to listen to any exercise advice. Which told me “don’t workout every day, it’s bad! change muscle groups! take rest!”. So I had a hard time converting it into a habit and got stuck in overdo-sore-timeout cycle.
The key thing is to do/start with the same thing everyday, with slight variations in the end. Make it an autopilot routine during which you can be mentally elsewhere. Only then you may think “I have to…” and [click] it’s done before you even notice.
I like to establish the habit of consistently succeeding. I feel that we often need to start with "small" successes, then gradually increase the complexity/ambition.
Before you know it, you're routinely completing pretty damn ambitious stuff.
I can testify to this, but would also like to add something that OP's ACT idea somewhat skirts that I think is a bit understated: the importance of knowing when to NOT THINK.
When I was an accountant, my teacher once said "How do you eat an elephant?" (dramatic pause) "One bite at a time."
Frequently, the line between amazing achievement and wistful thinking is shutting up, turning off the "what if" part of the brain, and plowing into it.
I'm not saying people shouldn't think ahead, but smart people usually have the opposite problem of mental over-investment toward non-result-generating thoughts.
Yeah, because then harder things become easier, and eventually the thing that was once an "impossibly hard thing" is now a "challengingly hard but possible thing".
That’s the thing. Things rarely seem to get easier for me. I have just as much repulsion to many tasks as I did 5 years ago. In fact in many ways it’s worse because it all feels futile no matter how much I make.
And yet the only way to win is not to play. So I work as hard as I possibly can force myself to in hopes that I’ll be able to retire as early as possible.
Any advice on how to make eating frogs easier, I’d love to hear it. I get up early, I take cold showers every day, I do HIIT workouts every other day, and I have a complex productivity system for tracking what I need to do, I ruthlessly prioritize, and I do a pretty good job and closing the laptop and not working in the evening and weekends. I hate it all and can’t wait for when I can stop all of it.
Hey friend, this sounds like a bit of burnout. If you're anything like me, you may be a bit of a maximizer. One can optimize everything to the point it's not fun anymore.
Remember to spend at least some of your time doing something for joy. Do something new. Something you're bad at. Drop it the second it's not fun anymore. Or take a trip. Ensure you're spending time on friends and family. Just waste time sometimes and don't feel bad about it. Focus on a task thats not actually the top priority but is more fun now and again.
It doesn't get easier. You pick up more tasks and harder tasks. You can make things that were once harder things easier things, but you're always going to be working hard if you're improving. Make sure you do it sustainably -- it's a marathon and not a sprint. If you rush to retire but don't build a life you want to retire to it will just make it worse.
A remarkably undisciplined friend of mine had a different theory: Just purchases things to help do the hard things. If you don't feel sufficiently ridiculous you need to buy more.
We have numerous very expensive pieces of fitness equipment that we use quite regularly. I mean, sure, you don't NEED expensive equipment to exercise, but if you don't do it without the expensive equipment, and you DO do it with the equipment, why not buy the thing?
Of course, there's plenty of expensive fitness equipment gathering dust, but don't let someone else tell you "you don't need all that stuff" if it works for you. If it's stupid and it works, it's not stupid!
Thanks for sharing your perspective on the 5AM start of the day.
I’ve found the same for myself, if I want to feel solid about my day, I need to get up early and exercise and figure everything else out from there.
I absolutely hate it, but I can’t deny how much better I feel. I’m hoping that one day my brain will flip and I’ll genuinely enjoy it, but it is still very much a need and not a want.
I agree one hundred percent. Life has some good bits and most of the other bits are tedious, unpleasant and painful. But to reach the good bits you have to tread over the bad ones.
A big YMMV on what I'm about to say, but: in my experience, the biggest complainers at work are the most responsive and productive people. Because when a new request comes through, they're the ones who have already jumped in. They're mentally working through what it will take to get this done, wrestling with the difficulties and verbalizing them. Others are nodding and smiling but not really engaging with the problem yet.
I’ve found that complaining is productive but has a social cost. But I and others absolutely do work this way.
I started opening GitHub issues I never expect anyone else to read to help myself explore and verbalize a problem without having to nag anyone else about it; it’s been helpful and also yields a lot of what is effectively documentation of the “why” behind our design choices. Not sure if it would work as well on public repos or if you work with anyone that tries to max their GitHub stats (eg average issue close time) though.
I think there is something to it. The ones who complain but still trudge through are amazing. They highlight pain points and solve them at the same time.
That's the key: they still trudge through it. I fully agree that those people are indeed amazing. In my experience, though, many complainers toss out every objection possible hoping to make the new project seem so difficult that it isn't worth doing (so everyone will just drop it). Those complainers are toxic and can kill progress. But yes, the ones who verbalize issues just to make sure everyone has a full understanding of a project and the challenges in completing it... but still have every intention to conquer those challenges and stick with it to the end... yes, give me those types of 'complainers' ANY day :)
From my point of view, we get a new project that I think will take 6 weeks because of X, Y Z. Management thinks it should take 2 days, so they say go ahead anyway. The project takes 8 weeks to finish most of the features and doing this effort forced us to drop every other thing we were already maintaining and working on. Everything is late, the targets set for the year miss as we spent 2 months on this other project and nobody is happy.
As an "old warhorse," I can tell you that I have been labeled a "complainer," because of such "complaints" as "Have you considered what happens when the user does X?" or "I tried pretty much the same thing, last year. It didn't turn out the way I wanted. Here's what happened..." or "Is that thread-safe?" or "Are you sure that will never be called on another thread? You do have a few network closures, here." or "Did you make sure that you let the connection go, after sending that instruction? It will result in power drain, if not."
Those types of complainers are certainly better than the types who don't actually do the tasks. But even better are those who do the tasks without burdening their coworkers with complaints.
Starting your day with getting the most unpleasant tasks out of the way is a powerful tactic, and it’s something my friend calls “eating the frog”.
I find that most unpleasant things are actually just hard to get started with, and I can actually find myself enjoying them (working out, etc) once I’m in flow.
Popularized by Brian Tracy with the book "Eat that Frog - Stop procrastinating and get more done in less time",
the idea is attributed to Mark Twain there, but was actually recorded by Nicolas Chamfort: "One should eat a frog every morning, to find the rest of the day less disgusting, if you have to spend it in the world". The translation from the French tradition of the "nausea" to pragmatist Union America, where it came to mean "do the hardest first as a strategy", fits.
Are these folks hitting the sack at 6-7ish or not getting a full 7/8?
Couldn’t imagine doing this, purely considering the implications of going to bed with the sun up and offsetting my schedule to accommodate a commute that early.
I find it convenient mainly because I have kids. You can do quite a lot of heavy lifting in those first few quiet hours before they wake up.
Whether you can or should do it depends heavily on your particular circumstances, of course. But when I started doing it, I wondered why more people weren’t talking about it. Personally, I find it fantastic.
That's odd. I wake up early and take a long walk daily also. (I take the opportunity to listen to podcasts.)
A while back I'm pretty sure I would've hated it. But now that I'm in my mid 50s, I think this is the best time of the day.
Keep walking. Maybe it'll change for you, too.
I was not previously aware of ACT, but as someone who went down a rabbit hole of mindfulness meditation with a side of (secular) Buddhist philosophy, it struck me how similar some aspects of this are. In particular, the focus on aversion and the realization that aversion is usually worse than whatever pain is involved in the thing we’re avoiding.
Going down this particular path has been life changing as someone who grew up in an environment that essentially conditioned me to default to aversion/avoidance, a default that culminated in a pretty big burnout.
Realizing that aversion/avoidance was almost always much worse than the thing I was avoiding was a major aha moment, and realizing that this could be corrected is when my life started changing.
Whether it’s ACT or some form of mindfulness+related philosophy, I can’t recommend this kind of internal exploration enough. The associated mental shifts are like freeing up numerous processor cores that were previously consumed by unhelpful thoughts and feelings.
Mindfulness meditation was the tool that made this go from something that I knew intellectually, to something I could observe directly within myself. Once you can see these things clearly, changing them becomes far easier.
Glad I wasn't the only one that saw that! Right up until the "Clear Values" section, I was finding this all very reminiscent of advice I'd received from Ten Percent Happier / Headspace!
Which is not, to be clear, criticism or belittlement - indeed, when different groups with different motivations or backgrounds independently hit on similar approaches, that's probably a sign that there's something to it...
There are a lot of traditional paths to life cultivation that have a greater weight of evidence behind them than anything tested by 20th or 21st century science. Sure, it hard to know what of that evidence is real, but please let me know when modern-day science has solved that problem. Scientific processes today are far worse than one might realize.
Yes, I'm somewhat defending my own particular branch (which I doubt is innately superior to many others, fwiw). But it was the LARPing enlightenment comment that caught my eye: it is absolutely a thing, and it shows up plenty in both traditional and "science-based" methods.
But my personal experience is that once you get far enough into something to start to understand what enlightenment would actually require, it becomes a lot less appealing of a target. I'm sure it would be great, but boy howdy it requires a lot of uncomfortable work. I just want to live better and feel better, dammit.
You can often sort out the posers from the real life cultivators by enthusiastically bringing up enlightenment. The real people will be the ones who (figuratively) roll their eyes. If they're further along, it will be done in a very polite, understanding, and non-judgemental sort of way.
"I was once like you, grasshopper. And I still am."
I think military folks sum all of this up as "embrace the suck." :)
> A mentor of mine likes to talk about experiential avoidance as a sort of "reverse compass." When we notice the desire to avoid something, it may actually be telling us what we need to move toward.
I rarely get life-changing advice from a podcast, but something I heard one time really stuck with me. This super-successful guy was talking about all the businesses he owned or something and the host asked him what his morning routine looked like. Paraphrasing, his answer was:
"After I've gone through my normal morning activities, I sit down and make a list of the things I need to do that day. I always look through the list and find the thing I want to do least, and I do that one first. Because I have found the things I don't want to do are almost always the most important."
You could argue this is also a recipe for burnout.
And thats why binary advice is pretty much useless.
Everything is a balance, but you can't embrace the suck for 10 years, rarely anyone can.
Sometimes we also avoid the reality that we just need to quit, get healthy.
IMO the secret is not to always be struggling but to always maintain the balance of both. That is also why for many people "Eat the frog first" doesn't work.
So I'll end this with menial - it highly depends...
Indeed, if you do 'suck' for 10 years, your career may be stellar, but your overall life, happiness, satisfaction and so on are somewhere down there in the mud regardless on the number on bank account.
Balance, 'pick the fight', nobody normal has infinite amount of stamina and burnout can happen to any human being if pushed enough. I know plenty of non-normal for the lack of better word, somehow broken inside. Great career, once you truly know them inside out, its a sad pile of crap. Over-competitive till last breath, always comparing with more successful, never happy with what they have. Often quite bad parents who pour their mental state into their kids too (but I think that would be impossible to avoid). And cycle repeats, kids with great grades, excelling in various sports but happiness and smiles are not their trademark.
Many hit the wall eventually and its not a nice sight. Some will never get back on their feet afterwards
It’s similar to how therapists address procrastination. You split your task into 5-7 substeps, find two that suck most and just do them first. Often turns out that the whole deal was blocked by something that didn’t even suck that much.
5-7 things in a list might be daunting. I've found that setting the bar much lower is a great help. I worked in an office that responded to world events. So the inbox just grew. My working response was to, before setting out for work, write down the one thing that I wanted to accomplish that day and do it, regardless. One thing. Just one thing. It was amazingly effective for me.
If any method depends on me initiating some action, it won't work for me. My brain will not only say "No", but it'll also often just shut up, not give any feedback and proceed to procrastinate.
For me, procrastination has some similarities to addiction. If I'm on a streak, I can maintain it. If I fail once, it's really hard to get back to it. I may be productive for a week, but sooner or later, something is going to happen that will allow me to procrastinate. When this happens, I'm like an addict, I'm not satisfied with a small dosage, and all limits are off. I know I should be working instead of watching Youtube. I don't want to do it, and I know I will regret it. All this happens while I'm typing "youtube.com" into my browser's address bar.
Various methods work on various people. Experiment and try different methods. Don't confuse it with trying multiple implementations of one method - if you tried two to-do list apps and it didn't work for you, skip the to-do lists and move to something else. My method is body doubling, but YMMV. Once you find a method that works for you, revisit previous productivity methods - they may supplement your productivity
ACT helped me turn around my life at a low point in my mid 20s. The problem it helped me with was essentially the same as what it helped this author with - how to do hard things.
The short answer is, if you accept that it's going to be hard, you can focus on the problem rather than how stuck and frustrated you are, and that helps you to not make it harder than it needs to be.
Of course, a person who needs help needs more than the short answer; in particular, we often need a lot of unlearning of bad mental habits, and we need to hear exactly what ACT is saying and, sometimes more importantly, what it is not saying... because we tend to hear what we expect to hear, not what is actually being said.
Genuine question: are ADHD people inherently disabled in developing self-discipline due to their brain wiring? [I mean disabled in the sense of "they need external assistance or must put way more effort", in the same way someone with a muscular disorder might need a cane or put way more effort into walking.]
Yes, they are inherently disabled. Medication can help, but even with strategies, tactics, and therapy, there is still brain chemistry at play. Medication can help, but has its trade-offs and isn't a silver bullet.
Self-discipline is also more costly. You can brute-force your way through tasks with ADHD, but it is more taxing on your overall energy. Those with ADHD typically experience impulses often and it's harder for them to ignore. Forcing yourself to ignore them requires extra energy. It's not sustainable to do all the time. It's hard for those without ADHD to truly understand what that's like.
In addition to impulsivity, executive dysfunction affecting starting tasks or work is also a big challenge.
I don't think this is true about brain chemistry or that ADD is a life-long disability. Just speaking from experience here, I was diagnosed with ADD as an adult in my mid-20s and then started using IFS therapy (parts work) a couple years later for childhood trauma. After two years of IFS therapy my ADD is pretty much non-existent and my executive functioning is better than most people I know.
My hunch is that for a lot of people, ADD is a result of growing up in a home that felt unstable so they never gained a basic internal sense of stability that you need for things like task switching or staying focused.
You can't generalize your experience (trauma mimicking ADD symptoms) to 'ADD [is not] a life-long disability' -- people have symptoms for different reasons and there are biomarkers for ADD.
Which specific ADHD biomarkers are you referring to? There are some promising areas for research but I'm not aware that any are yet accepted for clinical purposes.
IMHO many people with ADHD diagnose has really some kind of PTSD that started when they were children. And I believe that kind of condition is treatable. It would need a long therapy of course and a lot of changes in life. And I say this as a person with ADHD diagnose.
(I'm not GP.) I don't think the question here is whether trauma is mimicking ADHD or ADHD is a result of trauma, either in general, or in any particular case.
I think people lean into the personality traits, 'neurotype', cognitive styles, talents, and inherent tendencies they have as kids when it comes to coping with trauma. You use the tools you have. If you have ADHD and a situation is unbearable, hyperfocus is a tool you have— or at least a pattern you can fall into— that can prevent you from being overwhelmed by the feelings that weigh on you when that situation is on your mind. It would be shocking to me if ADHDers didn't often end up relying on features of ADHD to adapt to traumatic situations.
These things are interrelated in people who have both, and I don't think it's generally easy (or necessary) to pick apart 'which is which' when it comes to a specific behavior or experience.
Internal Family Systems therapy is a form of therapy that uses the idea of different "parts" of ourselves, and postulates that we can heal these different parts of ourselves by accessing an inner source of compassion underneath all these "parts" - suppressed emotional pain, defense mechanisms, coping mechanisms, etc. I've found it to be the most effective form of therapy for healing anxiety, depression, and childhood trauma, when combined with other mind-body practices.
IFS is the "Internal Family Systems" model of psychotherapy. I'm coincidentally in the midst of reading No Bad Parts, which was written by the originator, and covers the basic ideas behind the practice and gives some instructions for exercises. I've enjoyed the book so far.
This is sort of non-descriptive. Every time you are happy, sad, angry, afraid, bored, tired; that's brain chemistry at play. Brains are electrochemical computers.
Putting myself into a situation where I have no choice would mean being constantly in grave danger (financial, social, or relationship). If I fail once, it may have a catastrophic impact on my life. The worst part is that I may fail due to external factors that I have little control over (e.g., getting a huge loan to force myself to work, while experiencing a serious injury that prevents me from working for months). Anything other than looming doom wouldn't work on me.
I, a non-ADHD person, do not have to put myself into situations where I have no choice but to do the thing I need to do. I simply see I need to do something and then do it. Does this strongly deviate from how I described a disability above? (the inability to do something without extra assistance or significant extra effort)
I've seen ADHD person explain this as having every reason to do the task, know that they need to get started now, and yet, just can't get around to do it. I've certainly felt that in some scenarios in my life. It's like getting the timing to start doing the task is impossible and everything else, no matter how mundane, seems safer and more fulfilling to do.
It's like you are missing the drive to get that thing done to the point that your brain just tricks you into thinking that anything remotely productive seems more important and better to get started on now than the actual task. To me this is a rare occurrence, hence why I think I am not a ADHD person.
The problem to me is that this difficulty is hard to differentiate from self-discipline.
I suspect you will be less likely to feel that inability to get around to do the tasks that you know to be important to do it if you fail in a way that life itself, the universe, hurts you for the failure, as opposed to your boss saying "you're fired for showing up late".
I also suspect that some people use religion to fix this: Like picturing a higher being looking down and saying "Wherefore dost thou not now do that which thou must? Else, I shall smite thee from the heavens or cause thee great trouble in the afterlife."
"Just not getting round to it" is what my ADHD often feels like. Let's say I have to mail a package at the post office. I've got to write the address, pack it all up and then take it to the post office. At 9am in the morning I genuinely feel like I'm on the cusp of doing it. I glance at my watch "Oh, it's midday, better each lunch". No to worry, I'll get the package done right after lunch. 4pm rolls around and I realize that I might miss the closing time of the post of office so I rush to tape it up, write the address and hurry down there. I send it just in time. At any time of the day you could have asked me "Are you going to send that package now?" and I would honestly say "Yes, right away!" but somehow it doesn't happen. On one level I know myself well enough to have seen this play out hundreds of times, but I still think this time will be different. It still feels like I'm just about to send that package.
This happened on a much larger scale when I was in university. I had 18 months for my dissertation. Each week that went by I planned to write a small chunk of it, just to get going. In the end I wrote the entire thing a week before the deadline with my professor literally sitting next to me making me do it.
> I suspect you will be less likely to feel that inability to get around to do the tasks that you know to be important to do it if you fail in a way that life itself, the universe, hurts you for the failure, as opposed to your boss saying "you're fired for showing up late".
This is true up to a point. What ADHD people need is consequences ASAP. Your boss checking in on you every hour and providing constant pressure is much more effective than a meeting at the end of the month where your boss blows his top and fires you because you've done very little.
> I've seen ADHD person explain this as having every reason to do the task, know that they need to get started now, and yet, just can't get around to do it. I've certainly felt that in some scenarios in my life. It's like getting the timing to start doing the task is impossible and everything else, no matter how mundane, seems safer and more fulfilling to do.
To the ADHD sufferers out there ... would you say this describes one of the most predominant symptoms? Would you say someone who reads this and says, "That's me," likely has ADHD?
Meh, I find it hard to differentiate this from just laziness. Im sure almost everyone has shit they dont want to do because they don't want to do it.
My thing is mostly that there is SO MUCH i want to do. I need to read this book, I need to practice this guitar, I need to respond to this email, I need to schedule an appointment.
Its not a matter of singular things that cause me issues, I just want to do so many things that I just kinda shut off.
That's my main challenge. Stuff I know I need to do, and often times they're not hard or time consuming. But for whatever reason I just can't seem to be able to get started. (after getting started things are often fine. In fact hard to stop)
Agreed, it's so easy to blame your problems on the circumstances and feel good about it. Some people were just taught to always be victims (which is sad), and others just power through their weakness and eventually comes up on top.
Stoicism tends to be a difficult way to live but it does compensate in the long term.
My brief 2¢, and also my own way of doing hard things: you're allowed to complain. I've been in strength training for 15+ years, and as fellow weightlifters know it never ever get easier (if it does, you're doing it wrong). Sometimes I really don't feel like it, even after all these years, and I complain about it. I complain all the way to the gym, complain through every set of heavy squats, huff and puff each set of sumos, complain all the way home, whine up the stairs, and finally complain in, under, and out of the shower.
What works for me: forcing myself to start a task, with permission to give up at any time. It often extends to my true goal once I start, but still allows me to exit early when I'm in a bad mood without feeling too bad.
Going to the gym? 95% of the time I get a decent workout once I gey there. Once I was in a particularly bad mood, so I arrived, warmed up and left. It felt liberating!
Going for a walk? It feels nice most of the time once I get in the rhythm. Sometimes it doesn't, so I come back after a few minutes.
Reading? I wanna do it more. So the goal is to read at least a single page - often it leads to many more, sometimes it's just that page and that's it.
The routine + acceptance of sometimes giving up really takes a lot of stress away from me!
In keeping with the article: what value you are achieving with this behavior?
The article mentions doing a "tombstone" exercise: What would be written on your tombstone if you lived the life you wanted? What would be written on your tombstone if you died today? What can you do about the difference?
I would guess (and it's just a guess), that you work out because you want to be healthy? So, would it be important to you that in your eulogy it mentioned that you were healthy? Or maybe you would want it mentioned that you had bigger muscles than other people? Like, what's the value you're chasing? Since it sounds like overall the experience mostly sucks.
To complain is not a bad thing, and the thing you're complaining about isn't necessary unpleasant. Sometimes you just feel lazy. All those self-help guru questions are not my cup o' tea, you do you
Wouldn't it be more productive to focus on how awesome your workout was? Especially if you have been doing it for years you probably do sets with weights that the average person could not do as a 1-rep max.
Replacing a mindset of complaint with gratitude will bring about an entirely different world view and free up energy that is otherwise burned up in the 'complaining circuitry'. It can be difficult but is certainly worth the effort. You will absolutely become more productive.
But this was in response to a commenter describing a behavior of complaining, which may or may not coincide with a mindset of complaint. And the tone of the comment suggests that it doesn't.
A mindset of gratitude can coexist happily with regular complaining. One can be grateful to have something to complain about, or be grateful about how it feels to complain or have complaints heard, or just be both grateful about something and complain about it (marriage, anyone? Video games? Movies? Job? Family?)
>> A mindset of gratitude can coexist happily with regular complaining
No, it cannot. It is the case that one may not have a mindset of exclusively complaint, as one may have developed a capacity for more gratitude through the effort of being conscious. As long as there is any energy being exerted for complaint, that is energy that can be conserved and utilized for higher purpose.
For a complaint to reach all the way through the body and out the mouth, it must have already been processed through the brain. Complaining in all forms is a type of negative expression, and drains energy. The OP was commenting about how they complain going to the gym, at the gym, coming home from the gym, and while showering after the gym. I'm not sure what you're looking for as a definition of 'mindset of complaint', but this I'd suggest this is suitable.
You can think of complaining, an expression of negativity, as basically a polar opposite of gratitude. To begin cultivating something of a higher order, it will help to attempt to 'reconcile' the feeling of the two by feeling them both simultaneously. When you feel like complaining, or catch yourself doing so, make attempts to begin feeling gratitude. You'll soon find the gratitude will replace the complaining. After doing this enough, you will develop enough sensitivity and acumen to begin actually feeling both sensations at the same time, holding onto the 'complaining' feeling, while reaching toward the gratitude as well. Over time, you will be able to find yourself 'integrating' the two faster and faster, nearer the moment the feelings come into consciousness. Eventually (years), your 'complaining' will be supplanted and you will have a different mode of experience.
I do very hard things and while I do most of the things the author does at some degree(embracing the suck), in my experience it is not the best personal strategy for dealing with this.
For me the secret is like the famous Article says: "Attention is all you need". I distract my attention on how much "boring", or "painful" or "humiliating" some work that I believe is important is.
I just do the work until the work is finished, but I should not feel bored, pain or humiliated while doing it.
If you feel it,It depends on the difficulty of your job, if the difficulty is not that much you can deal with it without problems but if it is hard you will eventually collapse, break down and burn out.
I use instrumental music for that and also habits. I also reward myself for the good work done.
> For me the secret is like the famous Article says: "Attention is all you need". I distract my attention on how much "boring", or "painful" or "humiliating" some work that I believe is important is.
I don't follow ... can you elaborate a bit? Are you saying that, when you feel the work is "boring", for example, you somehow distract your attention from how boring it is?
Great if it works, but also be aware of the criticism against ACT for being promoted as "the proverbial holy grail of psychological therapies".
More on wikipedia:
In 2012, ACT appeared to be about as effective as standard CBT, with some meta-analyses showing small differences in favor of ACT and others not. For example, a meta-analysis published by Francisco Ruiz in 2012 looked at 16 studies comparing ACT to standard CBT.
I question efficacy as a valid measure for something that relies on the patient actually getting off their ass and doing something (as opposed to a pill, which is comparatively passive).
I think the more useful measure is: what results does a patient achieve if they fully apply themselves to a particular methodology. Of course we can also look at: what % of people that are introduced to a particular methodology fully apply themselves, but this measure is inherently secondary to the prior measure.
How do you see that measure as more useful? I see it as very narrowly useful. You’ve conditioned the input to the desired output.
Let’s say my gas tank is empty. One way of treating this is to drive to the gas station. This will fail often (remember, I’m out of gas). We could compare this to other treatments like using a gas can.
Driving to the gas station normally is the better treatment, because normally the gas tank isn’t really empty. But if we’re at the point of getting professional help, it’s actually the other way. We probably have a real problem. If I call up a tow truck company and their suggestion is to drive to the nearest gas station, I wouldn’t say that’s very helpful.
So your conditioning makes sense if the goal is to turn stars into superstars. It is not a good measure for treatment of people in need.
The first half of your first sentence alone should set off alarms “I question efficacy as a valid measure…”
> ACT appeared to be about as effective as standard CBT
I'm no expert but I don't think it has be dramatically better to be very useful, does it? CBT is effective and if some people gel with ACT more than CBT, then great. It might even be useful at lesser efficacy if it's effective for people CBT wasn't effective for.
Definitely worth pointing out, but I would imagine most people reading about this are deciding between ACT and nothing at all, as opposed to ACT vs another therapy, and that's a very different evaluation.
This got me thinking about side-projects, things I consider my life's work, but yet I make little progress on.
It feels like my programming job clutters my mind with concerns about work. Then, when I try to program for myself, on my side-projects, I find everything is already cluttered with worries about work, and I end up making little progress.
Or, it may simply be that work makes me tired, and when I'm tired I don't want to work on side-projects?
Has anyone moved away from programming as a job and found it helps them focus on their side-projects better?
I can (1) find a different type of day job (non-programming), and/or (2) work fewer hours at my day job, and/or (3) find a day job that I personally find meaningful. Of these, which is most important and realistic?
As someone who has moved in and out of full time SWE employment to work on side projects and explore new things, I can say this does not work for me. After doing this several times it is very clear that my day job was not the thing that prevented me from making progress on a side project. It was everything described in this post.
Try working on your personal projects in the morning or just don't work so close to exhaustion on your day job. Working on hard problems with high intensity could lead you to burn out and that would be terrible for your employee and your own health.
I dunno, I just do things because doing them is clearly a good deal for me. E.g. the amount of money the job will pay me at the end of the month is worth the amount of misery it causes. My "secret" is to have a very low cost of living, so basically every a monthly salary covers a year's worth of living expenses. And, every year at work is basically a decade shaved off of the total employment time (and a decade closer to early retirement).
With math like this, it's not that hard to motivate oneself. Which makes me think, if people are having a hard time motivating themselves do to things they ostensibly want to do, maybe doing them is not in their best interest (e.g. too risky, reward to far away, reward to small compared to equired effort, reward only monetary while other areas of live are badly neglected etc.). The friction in doing the thing may be your subconscious yelling at you: "wtf are you doing, stop, this isn't good for us".
Reminders - using apps, timers, or other means to remind us of the new behavior
Records - keeping track of our behavior throughout the day
Rewards - giving ourselves positive reinforcement for engaging in a behavior
Routines - building the new behavior around an existing daily habit
Relationships - finding a friend to do the new behavior with, or who you can talk to about the progress you’re making
Reflecting - taking time to reflect on the progress you’re making through journaling, discussion with a friend, or in your mind
Restructuring - making changes to the environment to make it easier to do the new behavior – i.e., throwing out unhealthy food or preparing at night for a morning run
> In my coaching practice in the present, I try to cultivate these qualities in how I show up with a client. When I notice my mind getting overly analytical or wanting to say something clever, I try to come back to the intention to be loving and playful.
I don't agree with this mindset. being "loving and playful" doesn't solve client's problems.
I don't really think there's any shortcuts one can do to adopt self-discipline. I think it is born out of serious changes in ones life if it wasn't already taught and adopted at a younger age.
I think you're correct in the sense that one does need to adopt changes, but I'd offer a slightly alternate framing of the process of change itself.
I've spent quite a bit of time struggling to implement serious changes, because that's how I thought about them: serious changes. When framed this way, it sounds difficult. If you happen to be depressed, it sounds impossible.
The good news is that there are approaches that can help bring about serious change without requiring an outflow of willpower - willpower you don't have because you don't have the self-discipline.
Starting with small core habit changes makes all of this more possible. At some point, I was able to convince myself that if I'm willing to spend <n> hours on distraction each day, I can commit to 10 minutes of mindfulness each morning.
That 10 minute commitment became a snowball of positive change. The end result was a lot of change, yes, but it does not require a herculean effort or some impossible transformation. It's more like laying bricks. Each brick is manageable. The resulting wall is much greater than the sum of the individual bricks.
I wouldn't call this a shortcut, but it was certainly a lot easier than trying to just "fix" everyone through sheer force of will.
While doing my best to distract myself from life at the time, I read the book “Waking Up” by Sam Harris, and this got me curious.
I’ve since been using the Waking Up app also created by Harris. The introductory course is a flavor of Vipassana or “seeing things as they are”, and that’s where I started.
Harris has an extensive background and relationships with many meditation teachers and experts across various disciplines, and he tries to distill the best bits from each into the core meditation course.
In addition to the core practices, the app has a deep library of content from other expert teachers ranging from theory/philosophy to guided practice, and I’ve found it fascinating to try meditations from various schools of thought. Some of the extra content goes down some (secular) Buddhism rabbit holes if that’s of any interest.
(Not affiliated with Harris, but I’m a pretty happy user).
the small changes that form habits don't come out of willpower and thin air that's a myth. the person was already in the mindset for positive change and motivated
One still has to have enough motivation to make small changes, yes. I'm not claiming that there's a magical path that requires no effort at all.
The point is that small changes are often achievable in situations where large changes are not. It's a classic case of breaking a large problem into small enough chunks to make it possible to tackle.
This is a drastically different undertaking and is far more likely to succeed than any kind of "big bang" approach.
Where is the evidence that this is how it is other than an intuitive argument? I would challenge that from the getgo. A lot of feeliscience ends up not panning well when confronted with scientific rigor. People aren’t in much control of themselves in reality, and those that seem to be often have so many pieces of upbringing context that support the development of agency.
I grew up in an abusive environment, and have dealt with the process of unwinding C-PTSD for much of my life (now mid 30s). The environment I escaped is the type of environment that books about learned helplessness (a concept at the center of modern therapy) are written about. I mention this only to add context to my personal experience, and to highlight that the mindset I had to escape was ingrained from the earliest age. In short, there was little to no "supporting the development of agency", and in most cases, the exact opposite was true.
The process of therapy, whether that's CBT, ACT, etc. are all about making incremental changes that eventually all combine to rewire how you think and/or act. The entire therapy journey consists of these kinds of small changes along with active processing of past events to free up mental capacity. I'm highlighting therapy here because the related disciplines have been studied extensively.
The same concepts apply in other contexts (and are common in fields like software). Outside of traditional methods of therapy, practices like mindfulness meditation have been studied quite a bit, and there is a growing body of research on its benefits [0]. In particular, it seems to lower friction for hard things by helping you see more clearly the reality of why you're struggling with doing things, and why not doing them is often worse in the long run.
> I would challenge that from the getgo.
To clarify, what are you challenging, specifically? The idea that small changes are easier to execute than large ones?
This has been the subject of deep exploration across many walks of life, and on the personal improvement front is at the center of books like Atomic Habits, which itself is based on a foundation of research. The reason small changes work is that we absorb them into our daily routines until they no longer require active thinking to accomplish.
Part of what happens is that you also start confronting the bad reasoning you've been using to justify not acting. Embarrassingly, I had to re-establish basic habits like brushing my teeth. Clarity through mindfulness led to the realization that avoiding the tiny annoyance of doing this each day would be far less painful than the eventual dental issues I would otherwise suffer. I always knew that, but pausing to actually think clearly is what turned that knowing into a deep realization.
I challenge the assertion excluding a context that supports it (i.e. trauma, influence from others, other things of the sort) that you actually have agency to alter your behavior even in small incremental ways if you weren't already doing so as part of a larger motivation that is strong enough to override your existing behavioral patterns. I just don't think people actually have that control. In every case where I see someone change there's so many factors that went into it that just obviously would lead you to understand how it's intuitive that they would have done so.
> if you weren't already doing so as part of a larger motivation that is strong enough to override your existing behavioral patterns
How would you explain getting into the state of “already doing so as part of a larger motivation” in that case? The fact that people manage to get into that state undermines the premise of your challenge. If what you say is true, no one would rise to the level of “already doing”, which is an act that started at some point.
> In every case where I see someone change there's so many factors that went into it that just obviously would lead you to understand how it's intuitive that they would have done so.
This is called life. The causes and conditions of change are tautologically the reason that people change, yes. But is this a surprise?
If there is nothing to change or no reason to change, why would someone try?
By definition, if someone finds themselves in a position that would benefit from change, that falls under your “other things of the sort”.
The factors that lead to change are innumerable and different for each person. Some of the causes include exposure to new information. For me, I stumbled on some useful books like “Learned Optimism”, which details the history of the discovery of learned helplessness. It opened my eyes to some things about myself that I didn’t understand, and was one of many things that led to a change of mind.
Causes and conditions that lead to change include reading comment threads like this one. Exposing yourself to information that challenges your assumptions is another potent change agent.
yeah ive been told a million different view points by therapists and been in and out of it for years and have tons of internal strife over wanting to be way bigger than i am but im mostly externally motivated so it doesnt end up mattering at all.
I tend to agree that there are no shortcuts. However I do think you can be disciplined in one area (e.g. work) and lack discipline in another (e.g. diet and exercise).
So discipline is not an on or off switch for a person, it's more granular and nuanced than that.
That said, I've been living these principles since I was 18 (long story, lots of tears, bring a hanky).
I can tell you that anyone can benefit from this.
But most simply, if there were one single trait that I think has been key for me; it's been self-discipline. It has paid off all over the place.
Finishing stuff takes a great deal of what people like to call "grit." There's a ton of unpleasant, boring, hard-to-digest stuff, in delivering a finished product. In many cases, it can be more than half the project.
In my experience, not giving up, and powering through the "boring bits,", when, what I wanted to do, was go into a fetal position under my desk, and sob into Mr. Floppy Ear Bunny, has done the trick.
It also does wonders for self-image, and self-confidence (which, unfortunately, is often interpreted as "arrogance" -nothing is perfect).
I've found that starting the day at 5AM, and with a 5Km walk (which I hate), is useful. Everything after that, is gravy. Real gym rats beat that handily. Many of my friends work out for a couple of hours before getting into work.