We all know the solution and a Devlin style reasoning was intuitive and convincing enough for me.
But the author has a point:
"In fact, these prior probabilities are completely irrelevant ..."
(did not know that Leibniz got a very basic probability wrong)
We all know the solution and a Devlin style reasoning was intuitive and convincing enough for me.
But the author has a point:
"In fact, these prior probabilities are completely irrelevant ..."
(did not know that Leibniz got a very basic probability wrong)