> Dont be shitty to people and listen to their voice are thing that any group of children playing may come up with them selves.
Not my experience at all. There's always a leader, and there's always a bully, and - if you're lucky - they are not the same kid. If you're unlucky, the whole group is a shitshow of gruesome sadism and "playing" that can lead to serious injury and death.
I mean, that's obviously anecdotal, but if children were so rational to invent things like human rights, why would we need caretakers and teachers?
I didnt say children were perfect or formed model societies, i said IP was nothing like human rights or democracy.
When you experienced bullies etc. did you not have someone you could talk to that would agree the person was being shitty?
the idea that you can own an idea is not something that has an obvious link to basic issues that arise from existance of people, humam rights and democracy are.
Just because some people are shitty doesnt mean we should lower the bar.
There are some reasons for IP but they should not derive from owning an idea.
Ironically, if we built a lord-of-the-flies society (based on child "morality") we'll have an arbitrary concentration of power that'll make our IP rules look like a picnic.
Seems you are arguing a against something i didnt say?
I guess you must believe you have some special ideas that you didnt get from anyone else at all, not based on any of you experiences and conversations with others that we all should pay you to use or refine (or even just repeat). And that you think it right to force these kinds of delusions on your children to stop them growing up stupid and naive?
Dont be shitty to people and listen to their voice are thing that any group of children playing may come up with them selves.
Those same children will copy each other and build on ideas each other have.
Thi child who demands no one can play a game or any derivative because they came up with it first, well, they are just not very nice.