But that's besides the point. If a law is unenforceable, it doesn't really matter. You could create a law mandating everyone wear green socks on Tuesdays, and see how many people comply. Or (looking to what is as you wish) how many people enjoy a puff of a joint despite it being illegal in most places?
Or remember the US banning the export of cryptography algorithms? How well did that go?
The state has guns but even they have limitations if I decide to copy a few words off a page in private among my friends. Same if I send them a few bytes using HTTP/SMTP/whatever.
I'm not going to lie... this made me laugh.
Your entire argument revolves around why content ought to be free to copy. What ought to be has no relevance to what is.
Find me 1 country that agrees with you. I'll show you 100+ that doesn't.