Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sounds like the financial version of dark matter



A fudge factor that makes your models agree with observation? Yeah, pretty much. I was never an expert in CDS so I always wondered if other people had better ways of dealing with it. But nobody I've come across has ever offered anything other than 40%.


Not really. Quants modelled stochastic recovery rates and they saw that it doesn't really add much. Fixed recovery rates work just fine.


It’s not necessarily.

A peculiarity of finance as a field of study is that a lot of the people studying finance only care about direct applications and a lot of the people teaching finance had this mindset when they learnt.

It’s easy to end up with some poorly taught material. If you carefully looked at the model which gave rise to the equation you are considering, there probably is a very tangible meaning to the figure everyone is ball parking.


>> there probably is a very tangible meaning to the figure everyone is ball parking

40 is awfully close to 42




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: