I kind of see their point. Freedom 0 is about the freedom to run software how you wish[1] and "commercial use" can encompass everything from FAANG down to one-man, niche businesses.
Yep the OSI’s position is that FOSS is free labor for SaaS and giant corporations. Look at who funds the OSI and I think there is a clear case of capture here.
SaaS is the least free model for software. Closed source commercial is far more open and free than SaaS.
Yes, it is important to understand that using open-source software in a commercial SaaS is immoral.
However, it should be noted that it applies only to open-source projects that were created by billion-dollar startups like Mongo or Elastic. Using software like Apache, Linux or Postgres is totally fine because it doesn't deprive SV startups (that are so precious to HN) of additional profits.
> using open-source software in a commercial SaaS is immoral.
I don’t agree with this. I’m not a huge open source contributor but I’ve made some contribs over the year and I explicitly checked out the license before sending my change knowing that it could be used within commercial software.
I don’t care. I’d rather companies spend money and build something else than have to recreate the OSS stuff they use.
I want anyone to be able to use my software for any purpose. I certainly don’t think it’s immoral. And I don’t think the authors and users of BSD, MIT, Apache and other licenses think it’s immoral.
