If I remember correctly, that's because the decode PLA which takes opcode + current cycle number (one-hot signal) has a bit that indicates "last cycle" which resets the logic to check for interrupts and begin a new instruction cycle, and for the unused entries it isn't set in any cycle, so the cycle counter "runs off the end" and there's no more active bit to continue execution.
On the 8086, the microcode counter would eventually roll over and reach a "next instruction" bit even if it went into a normally unreachable part, so I don't think that such a state is possible.
On the 8086, the microcode counter would eventually roll over and reach a "next instruction" bit even if it went into a normally unreachable part, so I don't think that such a state is possible.