Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not to mention all of the fuel used to move around the fertilizer, tractors, finished corn, the energy used to grid/heat/ferment/distill into ethanol, and then to truck around the ethanol. It's actually almost hilariously indirect and inefficient when you think about it.



Well all the final products (contextually, material fuels or just energy) have a production history: to call one of them inefficient you need to compare production processes. Diesel fuel does not come ready from "diesel springs".


Iā€™d like to see a comparison where the quantity of natural gas burned to fix nitrogen is instead converted to ethanol, using the Saudis process.

The bone of contention among researchers seems to be: whether the inclusion of biomass in its production has any discernible benefit.


What I mean is that to turn fuel into fuel with corn as an intermediary is inherently inefficient vs using the original diesel or gasoline directly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: