The time recorded in the meeting log includes only the time spent together in reading the book and working through the proofs. There are some more details about our reading style here: https://susam.net/maze/journey-to-prime-number-theorem.html
I very much agree that attacking problems from different angles is very important in building intuition for the concepts taught in the book. However, that's something that we did not do within the 40 minute meetings. It wouldn't make sense too because I believe solving problems is very much a personal journey where different people need different amount of time to solve problems. I believe solving problems is best done on our own time. Sometimes though we did discuss the solutions of some problems in the meetings just to take a break from the theorem-and-proof style of meetings.
I solved most of the problems in the book in my own time. I know another participant who did too. Of course, that took a lot more than 80 hours. I must have spent an additional 2 to 3 hours everyday for solving the problems.
I have kept an archive of all our meeting notes here: https://offbeat.cc/iant/boards/
I very much agree that attacking problems from different angles is very important in building intuition for the concepts taught in the book. However, that's something that we did not do within the 40 minute meetings. It wouldn't make sense too because I believe solving problems is very much a personal journey where different people need different amount of time to solve problems. I believe solving problems is best done on our own time. Sometimes though we did discuss the solutions of some problems in the meetings just to take a break from the theorem-and-proof style of meetings.
I solved most of the problems in the book in my own time. I know another participant who did too. Of course, that took a lot more than 80 hours. I must have spent an additional 2 to 3 hours everyday for solving the problems.