The comparison is not against "most people" though. When we search the web we usually want an answer from an "expert" not some random internet poster. If you compare ChatGPT even to something like WebMD, well, I'll trust the latter over ChatGPT in an instant.
It's no better for other domains either. It can give programming advice, but it's often wrong in important ways and so no, I'd rather have the answer verified by an actual developer who knows whatever technology I'm asking about.
And finally, when you talk about what is "enough", I'd ask "for what?" This is what people in this thread are saying. That ChatGPT is not enough for the majority of what people wish it to be, but it may be enough for some tasks such as a creative writing aid or other human in the loop tasks.
It's no better for other domains either. It can give programming advice, but it's often wrong in important ways and so no, I'd rather have the answer verified by an actual developer who knows whatever technology I'm asking about.
And finally, when you talk about what is "enough", I'd ask "for what?" This is what people in this thread are saying. That ChatGPT is not enough for the majority of what people wish it to be, but it may be enough for some tasks such as a creative writing aid or other human in the loop tasks.