> U.S. Copyright Office tells Judge that AI Artwork "created without any human involvement" is not protectable
alternatively,
> U.S. Copyright Office tells judge it affirms decision to refuse to name the AI as an author of a protected artwork
(when I wrote this, the title on this post was "U.S. copyright office tells judge that AI artwork isn’t protectable" and links to https://petapixel.com/2023/02/09/u-s-copyright-office-tells-...)
USCO tells judge AI art created without any human involvement is not protectable
or, to retain quote marks,
USCO tells judge AI art "created without any human involvement" not protectable
> U.S. Copyright Office tells Judge that AI Artwork "created without any human involvement" is not protectable
alternatively,
> U.S. Copyright Office tells judge it affirms decision to refuse to name the AI as an author of a protected artwork
(when I wrote this, the title on this post was "U.S. copyright office tells judge that AI artwork isn’t protectable" and links to https://petapixel.com/2023/02/09/u-s-copyright-office-tells-...)