> We know more about the Apple device through patent filings and leaks.
No you don't. Apple routinely files hundreds of patents (any major company does that). It doesn't mean those patents will end up as a shippable product.
All you know is the never ending rumor mill.
> these devices are already real and shipped.
Of course they are not
> As for batteries, that’s been solved 1-2 years ago.
Of course they haven't. There's literally no battery + cpu + gpu tech that you can put in an AR device lightweight enough for extended use.
All "lightweight" ones use a cable to connect to an external device.
The rest are bulky and heavy. Because you cannot bullshit your way out of physics and biology by pretending "this has been solved".
> I don’t understand why you keep doubling down on a subject that you know nothing about.
There's objective reality and there's wishful thinking
> Apple routinely files hundreds of patents (any major company does that). It doesn't mean those patents will end up as a shippable product.
Analysts have a good track record of predicting what Apple is about to release including specs. Stop pretending that it hasn’t happened on a regular basis over the years.
> Of course they are not
No. We have AR and VR devices that have shipped and sold in the millions. Those are facts whether or you decide to accept them.
> Of course they haven't. There's literally no battery + cpu + gpu tech that you can put in an AR device lightweight enough for extended use.
It already has existed in the form of 3rd party magnetically switchable batteries. It’s been selling on Amazon for at least two years now. As for the headset capable of doing this, 10-20 million have already been sold. Just because you’re not aware of it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
> The rest are bulky and heavy. Because you cannot bullshit your way out of physics and biology by pretending "this has been solved".
Waiting for incremental improvements to happen is very different from being impossible to do. This is not a hard concept to understand. Again, these are shipped devices and not vaporware. You keep claiming that some law of physics or biology makes this impossible to accomplish yet you still can’t name a specific law that prohibits progress ie you’re full of it
> There's objective reality and there's wishful thinking
Yeah there’s wishful thinking on your part pretending that you’re not ignorant of the subject, but the facts are in my side.
No you don't. Apple routinely files hundreds of patents (any major company does that). It doesn't mean those patents will end up as a shippable product.
All you know is the never ending rumor mill.
> these devices are already real and shipped.
Of course they are not
> As for batteries, that’s been solved 1-2 years ago.
Of course they haven't. There's literally no battery + cpu + gpu tech that you can put in an AR device lightweight enough for extended use.
All "lightweight" ones use a cable to connect to an external device.
The rest are bulky and heavy. Because you cannot bullshit your way out of physics and biology by pretending "this has been solved".
> I don’t understand why you keep doubling down on a subject that you know nothing about.
There's objective reality and there's wishful thinking