It's hilarious how you assume that the summary of the collective ideas of scientists today know everything that is physically possible when there are many examples throughout history where the collective understanding of physics has been wrong and it takes unique individuals to prove them wrong.
There is data to suggest the objects are moving at speeds that defy our current understanding of physics. There's no reason to not keep following the data.
> [...] there are many examples throughout history where the collective understanding of physics has been wrong and it takes unique individuals to prove them wrong.
Yes. And every time the correct solution eventually reached was not 'alien technology at work'.
> There is data to suggest the objects are moving at speeds that defy our current understanding of physics.
That nullifies all the science since Newton, including Newton.
> There's no reason to not keep following the data.
Yes, and in the recent case of registering FTL neutrinos data was followed right up to faulty connection in the measurement device.
> And every time the correct solution eventually reached was not 'alien technology at work'.
Then why not let these scientists reach that conclusion if that ends up being the same.
> That nullifies all the science since Newton, including Newton.
Einstein nullified Newton's science. That's the way science works. We know Newtonian physics and General Relativity are incomplete. There's significant evidence that we are witnessing something that is breaking our current known laws of physics. With more data we can rule out faulty sensors, but we still need to study this.
Why are you so adamant about not studying something interesting? If we were all like you then science would never advance.
It's hilarious how you assume that the summary of the collective ideas of scientists today know everything that is physically possible when there are many examples throughout history where the collective understanding of physics has been wrong and it takes unique individuals to prove them wrong.
There is data to suggest the objects are moving at speeds that defy our current understanding of physics. There's no reason to not keep following the data.