Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is like PE takeovers that sink companies that were previously treading water. It took on a new, ongoing expense that it couldn't afford. The layoffs, the auction, not paying leases, and this, all seem to have some cost cutting angle to them. I don't think it's necessarily because Musk is cheap or sees lots of fat to cut; I think he's desperate to lose less of his original investment.



I still don't understand why this behavior -- leveraged buyouts -- should not be illegal. Congresspeople are tools, I guess.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: