> Maybe it's not the worst idea in the world to have enforced engineering standards for the digital built environment like we have for the non-digital built environment
If you're building infrastructure control systems, sure.
But for software that "enable human-to-human communication"?
Do we have engineering standards for printing out pamphlets, teaching foreign languages, inventing board games, writing a song?
Obviously the standards should be in concordance with how critical the infrastructure is. I thought that went without saying. I'm just trying to ask if we should expect working on critical infrastructure to be "fun" and not burdened by regulations.
Yea, I wouldn't have a problem with that regulation if it would be applied to only these critical areas. But it seems that they want to apply this directive to all software that's sold in the EU.
To be fair, I haven't read the actual draft, just read some reporting about the implications for open source software.
If you're building infrastructure control systems, sure.
But for software that "enable human-to-human communication"?
Do we have engineering standards for printing out pamphlets, teaching foreign languages, inventing board games, writing a song?