Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Agree a lot with this. The test (quoted below) has absolutely nothing to do with the skills that a 10x developer possess.

A 10x developer is the one to identify that the stories don't need to be done at all, if one just deletes some codr elsewhere. Connect the pieces and find better overall architectures. Solve the REAL business problem with a small script instead of 3 new microservices required if one wish to provide enough tasks to work on for 10 devs. And so on.

The test mentioned here is just too low level, a lot of the problem space is already resolved at the start of the test and limited potential for a 10x developer.

Also, because of all the overhead in communication and the breakdown of speed once more than 1 head is involved, it is enough to do "the job of 3" to become "10x", since tasks that need 3 regular devs end up taking a lot longer due to the communiciation effort.

Again, in this test it seems the meetings and communication that slows everyone down by being multiple participants are already completed, assuming everyone did the task alone..

Relevant quote:

"[..] each solution involved simple input, output, modularization, and the use of control and loop logic. Each was the size of one or two small Agile user stories requiring two or more hours to implement. The student recorded time on the major activities needed to complete a solution that passed all required tests, including planning, design, coding, testing, and personal reviews."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: