On: NanoGPT

[wut42]

afaik, gpt-4 is mostly rumours so far, same thing for the 1.5T number. gpt-4 is suerly coming.

[wnkrshm → wut42]

Maybe it will be called GPT-XP by then, with Microsoft owning half of it.

[belter → wnkrshm]

Looking forward to see GPT-4 recommending Linux and Libre Office instead of Windows/Office as the logical choice out of 250 IQ ML Model...

[ben_w → wnkrshm]

In my imagination, OpenAI does what Bungie did when MS bought them, and open-sources what used to be their crown jewels.

That said, GPT-AlephOne only makes sense if there's a preceding GPT-∞.

[egorfine → wnkrshm]

They have got to release GPT-3.11 For Workgroups first.

[awestroke → wnkrshm]

Or GPT-365

[MikeDelta → awestroke]

Then they can bring back the talking paperclip, but this time actually useful.

[generalizations → MikeDelta]

It could actually work. It would be an incredibly gutsy move and I love it, and they'd probably earn a lot of respect. They’d get so much press for it. And if it held up, it’d probably be one of the things that MS is remembered for.

[int_19h → awestroke]

Why not ask GPT itself what it wants to be called?

[wut42 → awestroke]

Or GPT One.

[taneq → wnkrshm]

GPT-10 will be evergreen and 'the last version of GPT'.

And then three years later GPT-11 will be required to run the latest games.