On: Game prototype using AI assisted graphics

[thom]

We’ll see how this turns out, but if we’re in the “this is clearly a lie” phase of AI progress then that seems pretty big.

[cableshaft → thom]

An artist recently was banned from the r/art subreddit[1] because the moderator thought it was A.I. art when it wasn't. So yeah, we are at that point.

[1]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3p9yg/artist-banned-from-ar...

[dagmx → cableshaft]

We’ve always been at that point because art is a spectrum with no defined boundaries.

There is no single metric for quality, and there’s been tons of artists who put out generic work in the past that have been mistaken for plagiarism in a similar vein.

Art is not a Boolean, therefore neither are comparisons

[TillE → thom]

I believe that an AI can generate this sort of thing, it's just odd that a brief prompt to a general-purpose art AI can consistently generate an extremely specific model sheet like this.

[CuriouslyC → TillE]

I wouldn't say consistently, for a given prompt a lot of seeds will be total garbage. It's not uncommon even when you're very good at prompting and tuning the model to need to generate 20+ images with the same prompt to find something that's close to what you want.

[lm28469 → TillE]

> it's just odd that a brief prompt to a general-purpose art AI can consistently generate an extremely specific model sheet like this.

Well it's trained on thousands of character sheets so it's not so surprising after all, it still generates a lot of garbage too

[coffeebeqn → TillE]

This is mid journey which is trained specifically for game like things unlike a general model like dalle. I’ve seen people make incredible concept art with it