1. It's extremely hateful to see how much information Facebook shares, and by default. I am fairly certain I never saw a permissions dialog to a lot of these sites.
I also really hate how you can't allow or deny any given permission; 99% of apps I've seen use Twitter or Facebook as a single sign on. There is absolutely no reason for any of these to have that much access to personal information.
2. It requires Facebook in order to leave a comment? I extremely hate how this has become a "thing". I mourn the loss of anonymity on the internet.
> I am fairly certain I never saw a permissions dialog to a lot of these sites.
Really? There's nothing on mine I didn't explicitly give permissions to, but then, once I add something that looks interesting, I explicitly go back and remove it again right then so I don't forget...
> I also really hate how you can't allow or deny any given permission
Sure you can. There's a nice big cancel button.
Also, the new version of the dialog allows you to remove most permissions on-the-fly if you don't like giving them. You can't remove the basic set of data or the e-mail requirement, but you can remove things like user likes etc.
Is it just me, or is Facebook the furthest behind on all things user experience? Case in point: three clicks to remove access from an app on Facebook (1. Click 'X" 2. Click 'Remove' 3. Click 'OK'). On Twitter, it was one click, and if you want to change it, there's an "undo" button right there waiting for you.
Mix in that every incarnation of Facebook's own clients is almost completely different (iPhone vs. iPad vs. Android vs. Web), and you have a user experience nightmare. 90% of the phone calls I get from non-technical friends and family are "How do I do X on Facebook?". The first question I always have to ask: "Are you on an App or on the web?"
Facebook doesn't want to make it easy to revoke access to your data. They intentionally made it 3 clicks, just to make it more difficult. If it was super easy to revoke access to apps, developers might not be so interested in writing for their platform.
That, or the incomplete user experience is simply due to Facebook's motto of "Done is better than perfect." There are plenty of areas where the UI is lacking that have no affect on app developers.
Nice! Just revoked access to about 40 things on Twitter , 30 on Flickr, 15 on Google, a handful on LinkedIn, 11 on dropbox, and about 150 (yikes!) on Facebook.
"Now click the icons and get ready for a surprise!". I was not surprised. Although one annoying thing is that Facebook auto-auths some websites such as Rotten Tomatoes. (Afaik it has that also for Yelp)
I don't use fb much, but I'm sometimes logged in while doing other things and it was a huge wtf moment for me to see how many websites were authorized even tough I've never done such a thing.
Same with me, this was helpful, but more could be done. Even just a monthly reminder overview with a list of new services I've connected to would be very helpful.
Awesome site, thanks for creating it! I tend to keep mine pretty clean, but it's such a PITA to hunt down all the dangling ends that shortcuts are very much appreciated :)
I also really hate how you can't allow or deny any given permission; 99% of apps I've seen use Twitter or Facebook as a single sign on. There is absolutely no reason for any of these to have that much access to personal information.
2. It requires Facebook in order to leave a comment? I extremely hate how this has become a "thing". I mourn the loss of anonymity on the internet.
3. The above site could be great for phishing.