I agree that each person/organization should look at the security properties of a system and assess their risk against what technology is appropriate. It's entirely reasonable that as a non-targeted person with low value secrets, many of the attacks here don't have ROI for a potential attacker and as a result are neither likely or impactful.
What's important is that other persons and organizations who may be targeted - that they choose what technology to use, knowing what kinds of attacks are possible. For example a human rights activist might very well be targeted by phishing attacks and choose not to store secrets by this method.
I am just trying to enumerate the properties so that persons/organizations can evaluate a match to their use case. I don't believe any system is perfect for all use cases and I don't hold any system to such a standard.
What's important is that other persons and organizations who may be targeted - that they choose what technology to use, knowing what kinds of attacks are possible. For example a human rights activist might very well be targeted by phishing attacks and choose not to store secrets by this method.
I am just trying to enumerate the properties so that persons/organizations can evaluate a match to their use case. I don't believe any system is perfect for all use cases and I don't hold any system to such a standard.