What's the point of Mahalo anyway? Does anyone actually use it? I took a quick look and it seems like a weird mix of Dogpile, About.com, and Wikipedia without any unique value added. The searches I tried for a few consumer products and technical terms turned up mostly irrelevant results.
A year ago it was quite common to see Mahalo show up in google searches. They're in decline.
Hate to bring up digg, but its in a positive light rather than my usual bitching. When we were around 4 million uniques we had 4 people (not actually employees, this was pre-series A), and Calacanis tried to buy us for $5 mill (almost all of it subject to earnouts). Rough subjective cash estimate of mahalo valuation based on his own offer to digg - half a mill.
If Calacanis was 1/4 of awesome as he thought he was, or the people he hired were 1/2 as good as he says they are, or he had 1/3 as much money as he says he does, he would have done everything in his power to keep these people including reducing his own salary to $0.
Agreed. I think it's hilarious watching so many companies use the current situation as an excuse to fire people. I have no problem with CEOs firing people for whatever reason but it is pretty pathetic when they use such transparent and bullshit excuses.
If they're never told their performance is inadequate, how will they ever know to improve? This reminds of the old political correctness slide into oblivion...
You're assumption is usually false in my experience. Most of the people I laid off were told of their shortcomings long before being laid off. It's expensive to find and hire good people and it's also human nature, at least mine, to try to help people improve before giving up on them. Also, when profits are high it's easy to let things slide. When those profits evaporate and tough choices have to be made you lay off rather than fire those that never met the expectations.
Where is the slide into oblivion exactly? I think the slide begins when we loose our humanity and run around firing people willy nilly.
He's a great business mind but a seemingly terrible leader. If I hire someone I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure they keep their job (provided they are doing their job and doing it well).
All he's doing at this point is contributing to and prolonging the recession by firing people. In the long run, firing 10% of the workforce isn't going to be the life or death of the company.
I don't understand your reasoning at all. He specifically states that reducing the workforce will give Mahalo an extra year of runway. That could definitely be the difference between life and death.
I don't know - being a leader means making the best possible decision, even if it isn't popular. If a 10% cut saves the other 90%, that's a trade I would gladly take.
If you make decisions based on what will probably happen, the proactive thing is to shut down the operation entirely, because most companies fail. But you don't know whether that's going to happen.
Firing people is not free. All the time and energy spent investing in them is essentially gone. You shouldn't do it unless you have a solid reason to.
